" /> August 2006 Archives: Save and Conserve

« July 2006 | home | September 2006 »

August 30, 2006

Mississippi River Blues: Extreme Drought In Progress

Save and Conserve tends to focus on the hydrocarbon landscape more than other natural resources, but water has been more and more on my mind lately. This is due largely to the ongoing and growing drought situation in the western US.

Seems the Mississippi is running low - not at the alltime low, but with no rains forecast, the river won't be rising anytime soon. The trickle down effect of drought has major impacts to the transportation system in the region which relies on the river to ship grains & crops down river to ports. Since the river is lower, barges must carry less cargo (so they don't run aground), which means it costs more to ship and lowers supply. Subsequently, food prices will rise.

China has been dealing with their own major drought, too. Droughts mean lower river levels ... but they also mean less drinking water. Expect to see more in the news about conflicts over water in the western US over the next couple of months.

Check out the drought monitor to get a sense for the trend in the US. I recommend the 12-week animation loop. Yikes.

Let's hope the west isn't heading for another Dust Bowl. Nothing good looking on that page.

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

August 23, 2006

Review of Stephen Leeb's "The Coming Economic Collapse"

In his book "The Coming Economic Collapse", Stephen Leeb, PhD makes the case that America is on the verge of economic meltdown due to an impending, devastating energy crisis. Leeb states early on:

An economic crisis is near at hand in America today, the kind of dramatic, earth-shattering crisis that periodically threatens the very survival of civilization. More specifically, it is an energy crisis brought about by the conflict between rising global demand for energy and our growing inability to increase energy production.

Pretty strong stuff. Seeking to answer the reader's obvious question "How can you expect me to believe that America - the world's undisputed military and economic superpower - is on the verge of societal or economic collapse when things seem to be running normally, just as they have for years?", Leeb devotes the initial chapters of the book to psychology. Leeb introduces the reader to the concept of groupthink - also known as the blind leading the blind. Per wikipedia, groupthink is "a mode of thought whereby individuals intentionally conform to what they perceive to be the consensus of the group."

Leeb's target is Wall Street, and he effectively shows us groupthink in recent action (dot com bubble & crash) as well as debunking the efficacy of the Modern Portfolio Theory (diversify holdings for best results), which is the de facto investment strategy of most money managers. Leeb is clearly a contrarian and he argues that political and business leaders are unable to see the forest through the trees, leading to the herd mentality which promotes the status quo.

Accepting that oil supply will not keep pace with oil demand from rapidly growing "Chindia", Leeb next addresses how he thinks $200/barrel oil will impact the American economy. This is where it gets tricky. Leeb sums it up nicely when he writes,"The problem with rising energy costs is that they are both inflationary and deflationary at the same time, which makes it difficult for the government to choose the right [monetary] strategy."

Inflation from rising cost of oil is a major problem, because "the higher oil prices get, the bigger the increase in the price of fuels." Rising inflation tends to slow down the economy, which is deflationary. A slower economy typically results in higher unemployment, which reinforces the economic slowdown. Leeb believes that stagflation is upon us and here to stay for the next decade at minimum.

So how, in Leeb's opinion, will the government choose to deal with stagflation? It can either raise interest rates to slow inflation, or accept a very high inflation rate. Leeb feels that the government will be unable to raise rates, because doing so could collapse home prices. American consumers have leveraged their homes to the hilt. Destroying the value of homes would be catastrophic to the consumer. Leeb states his position about future policy:

Unable to fight inflation without risking an economic meltdown, policymakers will put all their efforts into keeping the economy growing, so that wages rise faster than interest rates and debt does not overwhelm the average citizen.

Believing that the meta-trend for the next decade is higher inflation, Leeb then transitions into how to play rising inflation in the stock market. His recommendations are solid, if not ground breaking. If Leeb is correct that the Fed will be forced to accept hyperinflation, his picks and recommendations could turn out to be wise investment vehicles. I, for one, found his argument compelling and thought provoking.

"The Coming Economic Collapse", which accepts the theory of peak oil, should be considered required reading for those looking to map out investment strategy in the coming decade.

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

August 21, 2006

Decaying Sewer Pipes: Another Sign of Decline

well, it's a monday morning and so i hate to dwell on bad news, but an editorial in the boston globe is so incredible i had to put a quick post together. the editorial is about the decaying state of american sewer pipes.

i had no idea the problem was so extensive. i didn't hear anything in the news about the hawaiian sewer disaster that happened in march.

in another case of "what happened to this country?", it seems that our sewer system infrastructure is old & failing but nobody gives a crap. it's amazing to me how people walk around with zero awareness of how messed up so many things are in america.

the author of the globe editorial is right. the recent oil pipeline news should not be nearly as worrisome as the recent sewer pipeline failures, which turn into public health issues and are probably just as costly to americans in the long run.

when is this country going to get its head screwed back on?

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

August 17, 2006

The Long Tail of Oil Production

in the ongoing debate about whether or not peak oil is now, jeffrey brown asks: "What part of this is difficult to understand? Find me a case history where a region has shown rising oil production when its four largest producing fields were all declining."

based on his background as a petroleum engineer/geologist/expert, i think it's safe to say there is no case history that shows an oil producing region growing production while its four largest fields were in decline. this is likely due to the fact that production in a region is constrained by a much smaller tail of low producing oil fields than the world.

can production from the long tail of the world's low producing oil fields collectively exceed production decline from the world's largest oil fields? i think the answer right now is yes. earth is a mighty big place and there are a lot of oil fields out there. brown may be getting too hung up on the "top 4 in decline" meme. many of the other big fields (the elephants) on the list are maintaining or even growing production. and then you have a really long tail of low producers out there.

if ghawar or burgan or cantarell have only recently gone into decline, i think it will take a year or two before we really feel the pinch in terms of global oil production figures. remember, if the peak is now, production will never be higher. as many have said, you can only call the peak in the rear view mirror.

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

August 16, 2006

Electric Bikes In Our Future?

i read an interesting article in men's journal about gary fisher's interest in electric bikes. fisher was one of the early manufacturers of mountain bikes and he feels that the next big thing in biking will be the electric bike. while fisher has already struck gold once in his life and has therefore probably had his day in the sun (and made his millions), it's nevertheless intriguing to see a powerful, respected industry heavy get excited about electric bikes.

it's indisputable that electric bikes make sense in terms of energy efficient personal travel. they make scooters and mopeds look like gas pigs. it's also true that electric bikes have evolved quite a bit in the past several years. batteries are getting lighter and storing more energy than ever before, improvements that make the electric bike more practical as a transportation option.

the article highlighted a recumbent style two-seater named the twike as an example of progression in the electric bike space. i checked out twike's english website and, while not the most user friendly site out there, it gives you an idea of how far things have come. the twike places the riders in a shell that would theoretically protect the rider from the elements. as someone who lives in the northeastern usa, protection from the elements in the winter months is a prerequisite to changing primary transportation vehicle.

although the product has many appealing assets, the twike is prohibitively expensive today. and, as the article pointed out, riding a twike on congested usa roadways would be akin to running with the bulls. america's not setup in a twike-friendly fashion, to say the least.

while i like the idea of electric bikes taking hold and becoming a realistic method of personal transportation, you can see that, for most sane people, electric bikes are currently too expensive and too dangerous to be taken seriously. one caveat: if we did get some sort of significant oil shock, i think we could see the popularity of electric bikes take off.

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

recommended at amazon.com

Add to Google