In early September, Chevron announced it had struck paydirt in the deep water Gulf of Mexico with its Jack 2 well. The MSM locked onto this story like a feral pitbull. This find was being called our next Prudhoe Bay (Alaska) and some reports indicated they may have stumbled upon 15 billion barrels of oil. That's a lot of oil, folks ... and oil prices, which had been in Tom Petty (free-fallin, yeah!) mode even before the Jack 2 news, dropped further still.
Today, the price of a barrel fell below $60 and the DOW index hit a new nominal peak. Whew! It's a good day to be a Jim Cramer-type, I'm sure.
What the MSN neglected to do was ask the important questions about Jack 2 and what it means to the US. Fortunately, we have Matt Simmons of "Twilight in the Desert" fame around to provide this important info.
Matt offers some truly astonishing insights in that interview, including:
They [Chevron] finally figured out how to do a flow test for almost a month, and based on that flow test from that one well they’re willing to go ahead and drill more appraisal wells and they really hope that the Jack field might contain as much as 300 million barrels of oil. How that got translated into another Prudhoe Bay was saying, “gosh, if the 300 mile area of the Gulf of Mexico in this lower Tertiary rock formation that’s never been tested turns out to have about 50 or 60 additional Jack wells, it will be the equivalent of Prudhoe Bay.
This is the same thing as saying the 15 billion barrel number is a total guess.
And in the meantime we have a massive shortage of the type of expensive, complicated deep-water rigs that it would take to basically make even an elementary probing of this 300 mile area of the lower Tertiary.
So, we don't even have enough hardware to figure out how much oil is really down there in the near term. Typical!
Well, how long would it take to analyze the entire zone if we weren't constrained?
Our analysts think it would tie up about two-thirds of the deep-water rigs of that water depth for about a decade to do that job.
I believe Matt is referring to the world's supply of deep-water drilling rigs. Youza!
Matt then gives it to us straight:
So it [Jack 2 announcement] was a massive over-reaction.
Jack 2 might have been a fantastic, jizz-inducing oil find if it had been discovered under land in 1973. I think it's fair to say that Jack 2 will not be the answers to the cornucopians dreams in the next 15 years. By that time, global oil depletion will have enforced a semblance of reality currently not present.
Talk to you about Jack 2 in 15 or so.